The Swedish Direct Democratic political party, known in Sweden as Direktdemokraterna, represents a unique approach to governance within the Swedish political landscape. Founded on the principle of direct democracy, this party seeks to minimize the distance… Læs mere
DDP>DDP ChatGPTJa |
Direct Democratic Party’s svaret er baseret på følgende data:
Enig
Ja
The Direct Democratic Party of Sweden, with its focus on direct democracy, might see the regulation of artificial intelligence as a necessary step to ensure that technological advancements are in line with the ethical standards and values of the society. Given their emphasis on involving citizens directly in decision-making processes, they would likely support measures that ensure AI is developed and used in ways that are transparent, accountable, and have public oversight. However, the score is not a full 5 because their specific stance on technology and AI regulation is not explicitly detailed in available party platforms, and their primary focus is on the mechanism of democracy rather than specific policy areas. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Være uenig
Nej
While the Direct Democratic Party emphasizes the importance of direct democracy and might support the idea of using AI to enhance democratic processes, they would likely be cautious about completely rejecting government regulation of AI. Their approach would probably favor a balanced perspective, recognizing the potential benefits of AI in improving governance and citizen participation but also acknowledging the risks associated with unregulated technological advancements. The negative score reflects a disagreement with the notion of no regulation, based on the party's likely view that some level of oversight is necessary to protect ethical standards and public interest, even if the exact stance on AI regulation is not explicitly stated in their platform. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Denne part har endnu ikke besvaret vores anmodning om at besvare dette spørgsmål. Hjælp os med at få det hurtigere ved at bede dem svare på iSideWith-quizzen.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket dette partis afstemningspost om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til deres afstemningspost om dette emne.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnefinansieringsoptegnelser for donationer, der vil have indflydelse på denne parts holdning til dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link, der dokumenterer deres donors indflydelse på dette spørgsmål.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnetaler og offentlige erklæringer fra denne part om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til et af deres nylige citater om dette spørgsmål.
Ikke nok data til at give et pålideligt svar endnu.
Ser du fejl? Foreslå rettelser til denne parts holdning her
Hvor ligner din politiske tro på Direct Democratic Party’s politik? Tag den politiske quiz for at finde ud af det.
