Try the political quiz

2 Replies

 @9KGXMFManswered…2mos2MO

I choose both "Yes" and "No, we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead".

 @9K3983Qfrom Ohio answered…2mos2MO

They should have a rigorous cirricula that includes a wide multidisciplinarian approach to education.

 @9FGWF67answered…7mos7MO

Yes. It is impossible to create a true utopia, and so charter schools cover the areas not covered by public schools. I'm autistic, and public schooling completely and utterly failed me. I now go to a charter school with a course specifically designed to support people with autism. It has given me a second chance at life.

 @958WLB7Liberalsanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but there should monitoring over the objective and the education that is happening in these schools

 @8TDSW7Fanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, For children that excel and would do better among other children that require accelerated learning to challenge them.

 @93ZP8QG from North Carolina answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but not at the expense of funding public schools. State funds should be directed toward improving our public schools, education programs, and increasing teacher wages.

 @92YHQCV from California answered…2yrs2Y

No, because education should not be privatized, and we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead

 @92RVS89 from Pennsylvania answered…2yrs2Y

Only if charter schools stop taking money from public schools while also cherry picking who they admit.

 @8JTDV5W from Ohio answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only if they are non-profit, not at the expense of funding public schools, and are not religous

 @8ZM5S5G from New York answered…2yrs2Y

yes somewhat because it gives people the rights and the freedom to express themselves

 @8Z3NQVS from Michigan answered…2yrs2Y

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, if they are non-profit but not at the expense of funding public schools

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but not at the expense of funding public schools and only if the charter schools are non-profit

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

 @8VJQ9QW from Ohio answered…3yrs3Y

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, our entire education system should be privatized - BUT, non-profit. Kind of like the Salvation Army.

 @8TKFNNS from Texas answered…3yrs3Y

Yes Education is super important for everyone including Self Education.

 @4Y3DHZCanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, only if the quality of education is equal to or higher than public or other private schools

 @4JYTC7Manswered…3yrs3Y

 @87V5TYY from Connecticut answered…3yrs3Y

 @8QDSNZY from New York answered…3yrs3Y

No, but they can exist as long as they don't interfere with public schools

 @8Q6C4Y4 from Florida answered…3yrs3Y

 @87V5TYY from Connecticut answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only non-profits and our public education should also be improved

 @87V5TYY from Connecticut answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only for non-profits and our public education should also be improved

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and our entire education system should be privatized. Charter schools, Military schools, and religious schools teaches our kids values and responsibility.

 @89SH3SL from Wisconsin answered…3yrs3Y

 @87W9GJ4 from Florida answered…3yrs3Y

 @8PMF46F from Ohio answered…3yrs3Y

Parents should have the right to send their children to private school, K-12, but on their own dime or through scholarships/loans, not at the expense of public education and the taxpayer. So yes, charter schools should be abolished.

 @88LK76J from Michigan answered…3yrs3Y

 @85Z5SQ3 from Alabama answered…3yrs3Y

 @8NZXHQG from Pennsylvania answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but we should also be focusing on improving our public schools.

 @89SH3SL from Wisconsin answered…3yrs3Y

 @6HDD83R from California answered…3yrs3Y

Nationalize all educational institutions (e.g. schools, colleges, universities, etc) in the U.S. and ensure free and public education, where a High School diploma or a GED shall be one of the requirements to attend a college or university

- K-4, 5-8, 9-12 grade levels
- Monotheistic religious education should be introduced (or reintroduced) as a school subject
- Socially useful school subjects should take priority over other subjects, while any non-socially useful class subjects shall be optional (in the form of electives)
- By the U.S. law, every public school must be required to establish 20 as the limit on the number of students per classroom

 @8LSVCGK from New Jersey answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but with no gov't funding nor the expense of taxpayers and public schools

 @LangworthyUS9th from Michigan answered…3yrs3Y

I fully support federal school choice voucher program. Parents can send their children to private schools, charter schools, religious schools, or homeschool

 @4BPXZFJanswered…3yrs3Y

 @7VXCKJ2 from Kentucky answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and make all funding in form of vouchers to parents to make the best decision for their children.

 @2PR69DManswered…4yrs4Y

No, broadband should be nationalized, guaranteed, and all education online only

 @gabehwknsanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but public school needs to be overhauled and the funding for charter schools should come largely from the states.

 @8H9WHD9 from Hawaii answered…4yrs4Y

I went to a charter school and it was a shelter for all the rich kids of lanikai.

 @8GBB4FJ from Wisconsin answered…4yrs4Y

 @8FPLGKD from Texas answered…4yrs4Y

No, for-profit charter schools are too unstable due to the number of children that are left without a school when one gets shut down. Non-profit and rural charter school options have valid implementations, though.

 @8FDNNMS from Louisiana answered…4yrs4Y

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...