Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
@5643HNN4yrs4Y
Yes, by reducing spending, tax breaks for lower income citizens, and establish a Universal Basic Income
@8VC2Q883yrs3Y
Yes, but discourage people from living solely on benefits.
@78Q5L5B4yrs4Y
Yes, for small businesses
@78Q5L5B4yrs4Y
Yes, for small businesses and people earning under $100k
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, in the forms of tax breaks for low income citizens and increased spending on infrastructure
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment benefits
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but in the form of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession and extended unemployment benefits for workers
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of individual unemployment compensation benefits
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and extended unemployment benefits for workers
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, lowering interest rates on student loans, and extending unemployment benefits for a greater length of time
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, with the combination of increased spending on infrastructure and quarterly economic stimulus checks for low and middle-income citizens, with an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits for those who qualify
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, with the combination of increased spending on infrastructure and quarterly economic stimulus checks for low and middle-income citizens, and an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits for those who qualify
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and extended unemployment benefits for workers
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, through the combination of increased spending on infrastructure, lowering interest rates on student loans, and extending the time period for receiving unemployment compensation benefits
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure and tax breaks for low income citizens
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, tax breaks for low income citizens, and assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and extended unemployment compensation for workers.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and extended unemployment benefits
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and extended unemployment compensation.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for middle-income and low-income citizens and assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but in the forms of tax breaks for low income citizens and increased spending on infrastructure
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens, increased spending on infrastructure, and assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, in the forms of tax breaks for low income citizens, increased spending on infrastructure, and assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession
@7PTCG385yrs5Y
Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and extended time periods for citizens to receive unemployment benefits. ,
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment compensation
@7PTCG385yrs5Y
Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and extended unemployment compensation.
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment benefits for both middle income and low income citizens
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, in the forms of extended unemployment compensation and increased spending on infrastructure
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and unemployment benefits as well as lowering interest rates
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure, quarterly stimulus checks for low-and-middle income citizens, and extended unemployment compensation benefits
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, in the forms of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, quarterly economic stimulus checks for low-and-middle-income citizens, and an extended period of unemployment compensation
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, in the forms of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, economic stimulus checks for low-and-middle-income citizens, and an extended period of unemployment compensation
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and extended unemployment compensation benefits for low and middle-income citizens
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits for citizens
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits for low and middle-income citizens
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and an extended period of unemployment compensation for all eligible citizens
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment compensation for low and middle-income citizens
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and tax breaks for low income citizens
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.