Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Reply

 @9FGWF67answered…1yr1Y

No, the global economy runs on debt. However, I wish for the benefits and salaries of government officials to stand as a buffer against the average crisis, whilst cuts to public spending may be deemed necessary in a serious crisis. Ending tax evasion and loopholes should always be of the highest priority.

 @952R2DSanswered…2yrs2Y

Seek a more balanced system of taxation that brings more money down from the wealthiest of individuals as well and the large and international corporations.

 @94HH78Janswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, reduce the unnecessary spending only and be more transparent with money spending.

 @8XZRSNKanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of high ranking government officials

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, if there is unnecessary or wasteful spending on certain areas, just ensure that the borrowed money/funds used in public spending is used more efficiently and appropriately. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt.

 @7TBHR2C from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PWT939answered…4yrs4Y

No, instead eliminate all foreign relief or aid, they can get that from the UN. Keep the money in the country so you can increase public spending on Canadians.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

The government should be forced to live within it's means regardless what happens, eliminate unconstitutional federal agencies which includes the federal reserve. Force the country to return to the Gold standard.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

How do you think cutting public spending to reduce debt could affect job opportunities for people who are about to enter the workforce, like many high school students?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

How could cuts to public spending in areas like scientific research and public health impact our society's ability to deal with future crises and pandemics?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

If the government reduces funding to public arts and cultural programs to shrink national debt, how do you think that would affect our country's cultural landscape?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

How would you feel if a public program that you or your family benefits from was cut to reduce national debt?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

If you had to choose, what would you consider more important for your future: reducing national debt or maintaining funding for education and healthcare?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

Imagine the government had to cut spending on roads and infrastructure to reduce debt; how might that affect your daily life and community?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

Can you recall a time when a government-funded service helped you out, and how would you feel if it was no longer available due to budget cuts?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

Would you be willing to pay higher taxes in the future if it meant the government wouldn't have to make deep cuts to important programs now?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

What might be the long-term consequences for our generation if the government prioritizes debt reduction over investments in sustainability and the environment?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

Should high school students have a say in how governments prioritize spending and debt reduction, given that these decisions will impact their future?

  @st60645078 from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

No, defund the military, increase taxes on the wealthy, and increase taxes on multinational corporations.

 @9334YP3answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government should have little or no money to spend in the first place.

 @924MYCK from GU  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, if there is unnecessary or wasteful spending on certain areas, just ensure that the borrowed money used in public spending is spent wisely. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only if they overspend much/when there is some unnecessary spending in public funds. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt. Also, reduce taxes on middle and low-income citizens and use the money to fund any new programs.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but do not cut spending on social security, medicare, and medicaid

 @8TP6QKSanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional in addition to drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials

 @8FVBGSVanswered…4yrs4Y

No, reduce military spending, end tax evasion, including loopholes; and increase taxes on the wealthy.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government needs to reduce their spending, instead of wasting it on items that can be build later. The debt is real and needs to be dealt with now. Also, decrease taxes as well in order to promote economic growth.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government needs to reduce spending, instead of wasting it on items that can be build later. The debt is real and needs to be dealt with now. Also, decrease taxes as well to make it easier to create businesses.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government needs to reduce spending, instead of wasting it on items that can be build later. The debt is real and needs to be dealt with now. Also, decrease taxes as well.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government needs to reduce spending, instead of wasting it on items that can be build later. The debt is real and needs to be dealt with now. Also, decrease taxes as well in order to promote economic growth.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government needs to reduce spending, instead of wasting it on unnecessary expenses. The debt is real and needs to be dealt with now. Also, reduce taxes for middle and low-income citizens as well so people can keep what they earn.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government needs to curtail excess spending instead of wasting it on unnecessary expenses, but not cutting it entirely. Also, reduce taxes on low/middle-income individuals and businesses while we get rid of loopholes.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government must curtail excess spending instead of wasting it on unnecessary expenses. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt. Also, lower taxes for low- and middle-income individuals and give tax breaks for small businesses while we get rid of loopholes.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government needs to curtail excess spending instead of wasting it on unnecessary expenses, but don't cut it entirely and only when there's unnecessary stuff. Also, reduce taxes on low/middle-income individuals and businesses while we get rid of tax loopholes.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes; the government should curtail excess spending, instead of wasting it on unnecessary expenses. Also, we should reduce taxes on low and middle-income individuals and (small) businesses (as a top priority), temporarily while eliminating tax loopholes for corporations to end tax evasion.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes; the government should curtail excess spending, instead of wasting it on unnecessary expenses. Also, we should reduce taxes on low and middle-income individuals and small businesses (as a top priority), temporarily while eliminating tax loopholes for corporations to end tax evasion.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government must curtail excess spending instead of wasting it on unnecessary expenses in public funds. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt. Also, lower taxes for low and middle-income individuals and give tax breaks for small businesses while we get rid of loopholes.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government must curtail excess spending instead of wasting it on unnecessary outcomes, but not cutting it entirely and some of it should leave it to some areas. Also, lower taxes for low- and middle-income individuals while we get rid of loopholes. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government must curtail excess spending instead of wasting it on unnecessary outcomes, but don't cut it entirely and some of its budget should be left into some areas. Also, lower taxes for low- and middle-income individuals while we get rid of loopholes. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government must curtail excess spending instead of wasting it on unnecessary outcomes, but some of its budget should be left into some areas. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt. Also, lower taxes for low- and middle-income individuals while we get rid of loopholes.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government must curtail excess spending instead of wasting it on unnecessary expenses in public funds. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt. Also, lower taxes for low and middle-income individuals while we get rid of loopholes.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government must curtail excess spending, but only if there is some unnecessary expenses in public funds. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt. Also, lower taxes for low and middle-income individuals while we get rid of loopholes.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

Make cuts on the stuff we can live without. Keep the government programs we actually need for the citizens of the United States.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government must curtail excess spending only if they overspend much, or when there is some unnecessary waste in public funds. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt. Also, lower taxes for low and middle-income individuals while getting rid of all tax loopholes.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the government must curtail excess spending instead of wasting it on unnecessary expenses. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt. Also, lower taxes for low and middle-income individuals while we get rid of loopholes.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only if they overspend much and/or when there is some unnecessary spending in public funds. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt.

 @3GZTJR2answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and reduce military spending and increase taxes on large corporations especially those that manufacture goods outside of the US

 @2KN8TLKanswered…4yrs4Y

No. Public spending should be one of the top government expenditures. Reduce military spending, close tax loopholes and increase the taxes on the wealthy.

 @8QBXF92 from Oregon  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only increase taxes on large multinational corporations and ending tax evasion while reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials

 @5BMX4XTanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, Issue bonds, reduce federal oversite agencies that compete with state and local government, reduce corporate loopholes or institute a flat tax.

 @8QFCFP7 from Missouri  answered…4yrs4Y

 @37T4GG3answered…3yrs3Y

 @5643HNNanswered…4yrs4Y

 @8Q6C4Y4 from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, we can do this by privatizing and stopping social security, cutting funding to other countries, and more

 @88LK76J from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional as well as lower taxes for all classes

 @88LK76J from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

  @DrEagleTalon from Indiana  answered…4yrs4Y

No, reduce military spending and raise taxes on the rich and corporations.

 @8HDMV9J from Utah  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but also create and keep a government budget and reduce military spending

 @6HDD83R from California  answered…4yrs4Y

50% flat (or proportional) tax on all individuals and corporate entities (e.g. companies, corporations, franchises, businesses, etc) regardless of income

 @93VVP97 from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

reduce politicians benefits, reduce military spending, end tax evasion, and increase taxes on multinational corporations

 @92YHQCV from California  answered…3yrs3Y

No, instead we should A. reduce military spending, B. focus on ending tax evasion, and C. increase taxes on the wealthy

 @8LVRPH4 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes and raise taxes on the wealthy, eliminate unconstitutional federal agencies, reduce military spending, increase taxes on large multinational corporations and focus efforts on tax evasion.

 @8G3KWCQ from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

No, increase tax on top 1%, introduce wealth tax on anyone making over $1 million annualy, close corporate tax loopholes, ban lobbying, tax capital gains and Wall St speculation, slash the military budget and hypermilitarization of police.

  @BestPoliticsIN from Indiana  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional and drastically reduce benefits and salaries of elected government officials

 @8SFDLS6 from Iowa  answered…4yrs4Y

 @6VWJ8PP from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

 @IINXMP from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes. There are too many wasteful programs that would be more effective on a state level.

 @IINXMP from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes. Abolish the Department Of Education, Energy, Transportation, and a number of other industries, as well as reduce military spending, and eliminating other major expenses that can be provided better on the state level.

 @heatherdvdprincessanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes. I fancy the idea of the government hiring professionals to evaluate spending regularly to require government funds be used as efficiently as possible/practical. Eliminate non-vital costs we cannot yet afford, even if they could be part of an ideal world. We must work our way up to a better world wisely, and that means getting out of debt as much as possible.

 @68QRLZT from Louisiana  answered…4yrs4Y

 @6JTZ4D7answered…4yrs4Y

No, reduce military spending, increasing spending for the IRS to catch more tax evasion and complete more audits, and increase taxes on the wealthy.

 @7GP32QV from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @7GP32QV from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but reduce military spending and eliminate all federal agencies that are unconstitutional!

 @kgtiberius from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

It depends. Spending should be based on building the economy through long term programs with multi-year appropriations on education, infrastructure (to transport goods, services, ideas), and public needs (water, utilities, health). If a program is not in these specific long-term, multi-year appropriations, it should be subject to spending cuts.

  @7V8WHYY from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

 @87KZ8P5 from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

Each Tax Form should include a connection to the internet to allow each voter to edit their position on funding on each program. If a program has sufficient funding it continues. If it has insufficient funds, the salaries get reduced from the top down.

 @866GF6V from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

No, reduce military spending, tax evasion, and raise taxes on the wealthy instead.

 @EthanHars from Iowa  answered…4yrs4Y

 @87V5TYY from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

 @842VWLK from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

no, increase taxes on multinational corporations and the wealthy, and end tax evasion.

 @8CQ4NFX from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

No , If they cut public spending they would need to cut the prices for every single type of product for consumers to buy for there to be no issues.

 @8FPLGKD from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

No, increase taxes on the wealthy and close taxation loopholes. Public spending on projects is one of the best methods of short term economic stimulus.

  @OnlyEyeNo from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No, increase taxes on the wealthy, close tax loopholes & cut military spending.

 @8G78S5G from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8GZRRDZ from Illinois  answered…4yrs4Y

No. Decrease other spending, eliminate tax loopholes, and invest in the green industrial deal to eliminate our debt eventually.

 @8JGSKD5 from Oklahoma  answered…4yrs4Y

yes, but do not raise taxes and do not drastically take away rom specific things

 @8KCJLH9 from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8KCZFTR from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

No, focus on ending tax evasion, reduce military spending, increase the tax on the rich and large multinational corporations instead.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...