Direct Democratic Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

The Direct Democratic Party, if it adheres to principles of direct democracy and human rights, might strongly agree with banning all sales to countries with human rights violations. This position would reflect a strict stance on human rights and an ethical approach to foreign policy, although specific policy positions of the party on this matter are not explicitly documented. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Direct Democratic Party of Sweden, with its focus on direct democracy, might support restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations, as this aligns with a general concern for human rights and ethical governance. However, their specific stance on foreign policy and arms sales is not well-documented, so this score is an estimation based on democratic principles rather than specific historical references. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While the party might support measures that promote human rights, a complete ban on all military aid to any foreign countries might be seen as too extreme or impractical. This position could potentially conflict with Sweden's defense and foreign policy interests, including commitments to international security and alliances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

The Direct Democratic Party, prioritizing human rights and ethical governance, would likely disagree with the notion that there should be no restrictions on arms sales, even to defend allies. This stance might be viewed as compromising on human rights principles for the sake of geopolitical alliances, which could be at odds with a strong commitment to upholding human rights globally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the party's likely emphasis on democracy and human rights, it would probably disagree with the idea of having no restrictions on arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. This stance would be inconsistent with a commitment to promoting human rights and ethical international relations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.