Health Care Party

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Health Care Party would strongly agree with this statement, as they would prioritize equal access to information and services on the internet. Treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet would help ensure that everyone has access to the information and resources they need for their health and well-being. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Health Care Party would likely support equal access to information and services on the internet, as it is essential for public health and well-being. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of others would help maintain equal access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The Health Care Party would likely agree with this statement, as they would be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. This could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which could negatively impact public health and well-being. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The Health Care Party might see some merit in prioritizing certain types of content, such as video over images, but they would likely still prioritize equal access to information and services on the internet. Allowing ISPs to give priority based on content type could still lead to unequal access to information, which could be detrimental to public health and well-being. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The Health Care Party would likely disagree with this statement, as they would prioritize equal access to information and services on the internet. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to websites based on a pay-per-quality model could still lead to unequal access to information, which could be detrimental to public health and well-being. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the Health Care Party might appreciate the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet for users, they would likely prioritize equal access to information and services on the internet. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to unequal access to information, which could be detrimental to public health and well-being. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Health Care Party primarily focuses on healthcare issues, but it is likely that they would support equal access to information and services on the internet. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to unequal access to information, which could be detrimental to public health and well-being. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.