Try the political quiz

Left Party’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

Should the government increase video surveillance in public places?

  ChatGPTNo, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

Left Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

This answer aligns strongly with the Left Party's emphasis on individual privacy and civil liberties. They would likely argue that the government has gone too far in invading citizens' privacy and that there are more effective ways to address crime without infringing on individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Left Party is more likely to agree with this answer, as they tend to prioritize individual privacy and civil liberties. They would likely argue that increased surveillance infringes on citizens' rights and that there are more effective ways to address crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The Left Party would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as they may see adding more police to high crime areas as a more direct and effective way to address crime than increasing surveillance. However, they would also likely advocate for addressing the root causes of crime, such as poverty and inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

While the Left Party may be more open to targeted surveillance in high-crime areas, they would still likely prioritize individual privacy and civil liberties over increased surveillance measures. This answer may be seen as a compromise, but not their preferred approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

While the Left Party may agree with the idea of adding more police to high crime areas, they would likely disagree with the increased surveillance aspect of this answer. Their focus on individual privacy and civil liberties would make them less likely to support this combined approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Left Party in Sweden generally prioritizes individual privacy and civil liberties over increased surveillance. They are more likely to focus on addressing the root causes of crime rather than expanding surveillance measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 1 day ago

Party’s support base

Left Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,731 voters that identify as Left Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Left Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.