Unity Party

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Unity party would strongly agree with this answer, as they generally support net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users and websites. They would likely argue that treating all traffic equally and continuing the openness of the internet is essential for maintaining a fair and competitive online environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Unity party would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users and websites. This stance would lead them to oppose practices that could create an unequal playing field for smaller websites and limit competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The Unity party would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users and websites. They would likely argue that allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field for smaller websites, remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The Unity party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users and websites. While they might be more open to prioritizing traffic by type, they would likely still be concerned about the potential for this approach to create an unequal playing field for smaller websites and limit competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The Unity party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users and websites. They would likely argue that a pay-per-quality model could still lead to an unequal playing field for smaller websites and limit competition, as larger websites with more resources would be able to pay for faster access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Unity party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support equal access to the internet and oppose practices that could lead to an unequal playing field for smaller websites. There are no specific historical examples, but their stance on net neutrality would suggest a disagreement with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

The Unity party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users and websites. They would likely argue that speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would not necessarily make the internet faster and more reliable for users, but rather create an unequal playing field for smaller websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.