Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 1.1k Conservative Liberalism voters.
33% Yes |
67% No |
25% Yes |
59% No |
4% Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment |
8% No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
3% Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development |
|
0% Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record |
|
0% Yes, and it should be at least two years of service |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.1k Conservative Liberalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.1k Conservative Liberalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Conservative Liberalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9SFMD743mos3MO
no I really think that It's a bad Idea, take neurodivergent people as an example, I really don't think it would be a healthy environment for them to be in, and I think that it should be a choice not an obligation aswell.
@9SBRFFY3mos3MO
Yes, but those with complications like asthma or other such hindrances should not be part of the draft.
@94BVXQ42yrs2Y
Not everyone, for example Haredim learning in kollel
@94B4TK52yrs2Y
Mans and Women should go to the army at least two years necessarily in case the home country engaged in a war with the enemies.
@92GPRF43yrs3Y
Yes, for men, but optional for women.
@8ZMDX9B3yrs3Y
Yes, but only for able bodied men.
@8YVPVWP3yrs3Y
@FilipR4yrs4Y
Yes, but give an option to those who refuse to do public works for two years instead.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Mandatory Military Service” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.