Nuclear power is the use of nuclear reactions that release energy to generate heat, which most frequently is then used in steam turbines to produce electricity in a nuclear power station. Since plans for a nuclear power plant at Carnsore Point in County Wexford were dropped in the 1970s, nuclear power in Ireland has been off the agenda. Ireland gets about 60% of its energy from gas, 15% from renewable and the remainder from coal and peat. Proponents argue that nuclear energy is now safe and emits much less carbon emissions than coal plants. Opponents argue that recent nuclear disasters in Japan prove that nuclear power is far from safe.
70% Yes |
30% No |
59% Yes |
25% No |
10% Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives |
4% No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
1% Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy |
|
1% Yes, and nationalize the industry |
|
0% Yes, but with public subsidy |
See how support for each position on “Nuclear Energy” has changed over time for 116k Sweden voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Nuclear Energy” has changed over time for 116k Sweden voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Sweden users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9KGXMFM2mos2MO
I choose "No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal" and nationalization of the industry while still allowing some private companies to help with innovation.
@9JLQ8Z43mos3MO
Yes, but only invest into other alternatives for example like mentioned before, wind, hydroelectric,thorium and geothermal.
@97BZMTS1yr1Y
Yes, but more priority needs to be put into the safety of nuclear enrgy
@95BWHNP2yrs2Y
Yes, however with proper regulations and safety
@8JVGPC83yrs3Y
No, but only in times of desperation
@94B4TK52yrs2Y
It’s becoming very complicated this question.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Nuclear Energy” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH19hrs19H
Representatives from more than 30 countries gathered in Brussels in March at a nuclear summit hosted by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Belgian government. Thirty-four nations, including the United States and China, agreed “to work to fully unlock the potential of nuclear energy,” including extending the lifetime of existing reactors, building new nuclear power plants and deploying advanced reactors.“Nuclear technology can play an important role in the clean energy transition,” Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, told summit attendees. But she added that “the reality today, in most markets, is a reality of a slow but steady decline in market share” for nuclear powerThe numbers underscore that downturn. Solar and wind power together began outperforming nuclear power globally in 2021, and that trend continues as nuclear staggers along. Solar alone added more than 400 gigawatts of capacity worldwide last year, two-thirds more than the previous year. That’s more than the roughly 375 gigawatts of combined capacity of the world’s 415 nuclear reactors, which remained relatively unchanged last year. Pledging to triple nuclear capacity by 2050 is a little like promising to win the lottery.For the United States, it would mean adding an additional 200 gigawatts of nuclear operating capacity (almost double what the country has ever built) to the 100 gigawatts or so that now exists, generated by more than 90 commercial reactors that have been running an average of 42 years. Globally it would mean tripling the existing capacity built over the past 70 years in less than half that time in addition to replacing reactors that will shut down before 2050.The Energy Department estimates the total cost of such an effort in the United States at roughly $700 billion. For much less money and in less time, the world can reduce greenhouse gas emissions through the use of renewables like solar, wind, hydropower and geothermal power.
Explore other topics that are important to Sweden voters.
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
High density housing refers to housing developments with a higher population density than average. For example, high rise apartments are considered high density, especially in comparison to single-family homes or condominiums. High density real estate can also be developed from empty or abandoned buildings.…
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
The United Nations defines human rights violations as deprivation of life; torture, cruel or degrading treatment or punishment; slavery and forced labor; arbitrary arrest or detention; arbitrary interference with privacy; war propaganda; discrimination; and advocacy of racial or religious hatred. In…
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
In 2024 global leaders including Joe Biden, Rishi Sunak and Emmanuel Macron publicly questioned the leadership of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Their criticisms came after the Gaza War reached a stalemate in March 2024 as Israel was planning an invasion of the Gaza City of Rafah. Western…