70%
Yes
30%
No
59%
Yes
25%
No
10%
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
4%
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
1%
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
1%
Yes, and nationalize the industry
0%
Yes, but with public subsidy

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Nuclear Energy” has changed over time for 116k Sweden voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Nuclear Energy” has changed over time for 116k Sweden voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Sweden users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9KGXMFManswered…1mo1MO

I choose "No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal" and nationalization of the industry while still allowing some private companies to help with innovation.

 @9JLQ8Z4answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but only invest into other alternatives for example like mentioned before, wind, hydroelectric,thorium and geothermal.

 @97BZMTSfrom New York answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but more priority needs to be put into the safety of nuclear enrgy

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to Sweden voters.