@ISIDEWITHQuestionseconomy11yrs ago

Should there be fewer or more restrictions on current welfare benefits?

In 2011 the level of public spending on the welfare state by the British Government accounted for £113.1 billion, or 16% of government. By 2020 welfare spending will rise to 1/3rd of all spending making it the largest expense followed by housing benefit, council tax benefit, benefits to the unemployed, and benefits to people with low incomes.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  National Conservatism

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 425 National Conservatism voters.

34%
Fewer
62%
More
33%
Fewer
47%
More
1%
Fewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most
8%
More, and deny benefits to immigrants
0%
Fewer, current benefits do not provide enough support
5%
More, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled
1%
More, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income
1%
More, current benefits should be capped

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 425 National Conservatism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 425 National Conservatism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from National Conservatism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @955WGPJanswered…2yrs2Y

Social benefits should remain the same but better controlled. I don’t agree with some supports like families with low salaries but having a bunch of kids that they can’t afford. This should be cut down to just 2 kids per woman l.

 @8WWYF4Hanswered…3yrs3Y

I do not agree with either of the two sides

 @98GH535answered…2yrs2Y

No changes needed, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income. So that we don't lose our growth(?)

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Welfare” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…7mos7MO

WHO Official Says Vaccine Passports Were A Scam

The World Health Organization’s Dr. Hanna Nohynek testified in court that she advised her government that vaccine passports were not needed but was ignored, despite explaining that the COVID vaccines did not stop virus transmission and the passports gave a false sense of security. The stunning revelations came to light in a Helsinki courtroom where Finnish citizen Mika Vauhkala is suing after he was denied entry to a café for not having a vaccine passport.Dr. Nohynek is chief physician at the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and serves as the WHO’s chair of Strategic Group of Experts on immunization. Testifying yesterday, she stated that the Finnish Institute for Health knew by the summer of 2021 that the COVID-19 vaccines did not stop virus transmissionDuring that same 2021 time period, the WHO said it was working to "create an international trusted framework" for safe travel while EU members states began rolling out COVID passports. The EU Digital COVID Certificate Regulation passed in July 2021 and more than 2.3 billion certificates were later issued. Visitors to France were banned if they did not have a valid vaccine passport which citizens had to carry to buy food at stores or to use public transport.But Dr. Nohynek testified yesterday that her institute advised the Finnish government in late 2021 that COVID passports no longer made sense, yet certificates continued to be required. Finnish journalist Ike Novikoff reported the news yesterday after leaving the Helsinki courtroom where Dr. Nohynek spoke.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…6mos6MO

Claudia Sheinbaum Elected as Mexico’s First Female President

Claudia Sheinbaum, the former mayor of Mexico City, will become Mexico’s first female president after romping to victory in an election billed as a referendum on the leftist policies of departing President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, a vote that handed his party enough power in Congress to push through controversial constitutional changes.Sheinbaum, the candidate of the ruling Movement of National Regeneration, known as Morena, had 58.6% of the votes with 73% of the ballots counted, according to official results from Mexico’s election agency.Her closest rival, Xóchitl Gálvez, the candidate of a coalition of three opposition parties, had 28.4% of the vote and conceded defeat. Jorge Álvarez Máynez, from the center-left Citizen Movement, had 10.6%.Sheinbaum’s victory was bigger than expected and her margin of roughly 30 points would be the largest in a presidential vote since the 1982 election, when Mexico still was a single-party state. Pre-election polls had given her a 20-point lead.The vote reflected a resounding show of support for the government of López Obrador, a populist nationalist who won power in 2018 on an anticorruption platform. After taking office, he launched an austerity program for the federal government bureaucracy and redirected spending to welfare programs, especially cash handouts that included students and the elderly, keeping his approval ratings above 60%. López Obrador, who won with 53% of the vote in 2018, was barred by law from re-election.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.