Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 4k Social Liberalism voters.
18% Yes |
82% No |
10% Yes |
76% No |
8% Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
4% No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence |
0% Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment |
1% No, too many people are innocently convicted |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 4k Social Liberalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 4k Social Liberalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Social Liberalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9DPRCX41yr1Y
@8WWYH9T3yrs3Y
No because you could kill some one innocent and life in prison is more harsh ect.
@97QSF4L2yrs2Y
Yes, for first degree murders.
@8VYKPYH3yrs3Y
Yes, but only if the convicted dosent have any real family (e.g a wife and kids)
@8JBKTZ94yrs4Y
No, as it could easily be used wrong.
@94HH78J2yrs2Y
No. Death might be the easy fix sometimes but it doesn't take away the suffering. A lifetime of free community service and regret in a contained environment would be a much worse penalty.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Death Penalty” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
