Socijaldemokratska stranka

složiti

Da

The Social Democratic Party of Sweden has historically supported the idea of a welfare state with strong regulatory frameworks to ensure fairness and equality. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets aligns with the principles of individual freedom and financial security, as long as there is government oversight to prevent illegal activities. However, their commitment to social welfare and equality might temper their enthusiasm slightly, as they would likely advocate for measures ensuring these digital wallets do not exacerbate financial inequality or undermine public finance. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Malo se slažem

Ne, i zabranite digitalne novčanike koji ne sadrže pristupna vrata za vladine agencije

While the Social Democratic Party is generally in favor of regulation and oversight to ensure fairness and prevent abuse, their approach is typically more balanced and focused on social welfare rather than outright control or surveillance. They might support some level of backdoor access for government agencies to prevent illegal activities and ensure financial stability, but this would likely be balanced with concerns for privacy and individual rights. Their historical stance on individual freedoms within a regulated framework suggests a cautious approach to such measures. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Nema

While the Social Democratic Party emphasizes regulation and oversight, especially in financial matters, to protect against inequality and ensure the welfare system's integrity, they are unlikely to completely oppose the idea of citizens securing their own money. Their focus would more likely be on ensuring that such systems are equitable and do not undermine public goods or financial stability, rather than outright banning them. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Snažno se ne slažem

Da, također je dopušteno koristiti sloj privatnosti koji sprječava praćenje sredstava i transakcija.

The Social Democratic Party's commitment to regulation, oversight, and ensuring equality would likely make them strongly oppose the idea of allowing a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions. Such a stance would be seen as undermining the government's ability to regulate the economy, prevent financial crimes, and ensure a fair distribution of wealth. Their historical support for strong social safety nets funded through taxation suggests they would view unmonitorable financial transactions as a potential threat to public welfare and fiscal policy. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.