Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
8>8 Personal answer不应该,请雇用受过专业训练的安保人员 |
外交政策 › 欧洲联盟
8>8 Personal answer不是,但严格限制迁移到该国,我们货币的捐款的条款重新谈判 |
移民 › 公民考试
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
8>8 Personal answerOm dem vill så ja. Men annars livstid ( helst i annat land). Utan att kunna bli frisläppt. |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
8>8 Personal answerDet är mycket bra om det är så. Men man måste gå efter kompetens och inte kön, så det borde inte vara ett krav, men rekommenderas. |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answerDem får rösta om dem är svenska medborgare, har bott här i minst 5 år. Man måste ha jobb och kunna svenska. |
环境 › 环境规制
8>8 Personal answer不,而应该为可替代能源生产提供更多的奖励措施 |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
8>8 Personal answer是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人 |
移民 › 双重国籍
8>8 Personal answer是,除非他们实施了犯罪 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
8>8 Personal answerOm det finns starka bevis, så kanske, dock mycket tveksamt. Men sätt på på livstid i ANDRA länders fängelsen. |
教育 › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerJag är för friskolor. Men inte religösa skolor. |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
8>8 Personal answerDe borde kanske inte förbjudas, men att dem knappt säljs någonstans. |
移民 › Migrant Children
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
8>8 Personal answerDet ska inte vara olagligt, men inte rekommenderas. |
交通运输 › 公共交通
8>8 Personal answer不,我们应该将更多公共交通服务私有化 |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerNo, funding should come from their members |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.