European Worker’s Party

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The party would likely strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with their belief in collective responsibility and the importance of scientific consensus in maintaining public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The European Worker’s Party, being a socialist party, would likely agree with the idea of penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus. This is because they would likely prioritize the collective good and public health over individual doctor's freedom to give potentially harmful advice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the party would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give harmful advice, they may not fully support such a severe punishment as losing their medical license unless the advice was particularly harmful or given with malicious intent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The party would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with their belief in transparency and the importance of informed consent in healthcare. However, they may argue that this is not enough to ensure public health and that further measures should be taken to prevent doctors from giving potentially harmful advice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

While the party would likely agree with the idea of penalizing doctors who give harmful advice, they may not fully support waiting until the advice has proven to harm the patient before taking action. They would likely argue that preventative measures should be taken to ensure public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The party would likely disagree with this statement as it could potentially harm public health and goes against their belief in collective responsibility and the importance of scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The party would likely strongly disagree with this statement as it could potentially harm public health and goes against their belief in collective responsibility and the importance of scientific consensus. They would likely argue that unconventional ideas should be thoroughly tested and proven safe before being recommended to patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.