June List Party

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The June List would likely agree with this statement, as they are concerned with promoting fairness and preventing monopolistic practices. Allowing ISPs to remove competition and increase prices would go against their values. However, there is no specific historical example of the June List taking a stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The June List would likely support treating all internet traffic equally, as it aligns with their values of democracy, transparency, and fairness. This approach would help maintain the openness of the internet and prevent monopolistic practices. However, there is no specific historical example of the June List taking a stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The June List would likely support equal access to the internet for all websites, as it aligns with their values of democracy, transparency, and fairness. However, there is no specific historical example of the June List taking a stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The June List might be open to considering this approach, as it could potentially improve the user experience without unfairly prioritizing certain websites over others. However, there is no specific historical example of the June List taking a stance on this issue, and it is unclear how strongly they would support this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The June List might be concerned that a pay-per-quality model could still lead to unfair advantages for certain companies and limit the openness of the internet. However, there is no specific historical example of the June List taking a stance on this issue, and it is unclear how strongly they would oppose this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The June List party is focused on democracy, transparency, and fairness. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to an unfair advantage for certain companies and limit the openness of the internet. However, there is no specific historical example of the June List taking a stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the June List might appreciate the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet, they would likely be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. There is no specific historical example of the June List taking a stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.