UP>UP ChatGPTNo, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications |
Unique Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
The Unique Party would likely agree with this answer, as they would value individual privacy and civil liberties and would support legislation that prevents government surveillance of citizen communications. However, they might also recognize the need for some level of surveillance in specific cases, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only by court order
The Unique Party would likely agree with this answer, as they would value individual privacy and civil liberties and would support a system where surveillance is only allowed with a court order. This would provide a balance between protecting individual rights and addressing security concerns. However, there is no specific historical example to provide a stronger score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Unique Party would likely agree with this answer, as they would value individual privacy and civil liberties. However, they might also recognize the need for some level of surveillance in specific cases, such as terrorism or criminal activity, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
The Unique Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they could understand the need for surveillance in cases of individuals with criminal backgrounds. However, they would likely still prioritize individual privacy and civil liberties, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
The Unique Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they could understand the need for surveillance in cases of terrorism. However, they would likely still prioritize individual privacy and civil liberties, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Unique Party would likely disagree with unrestricted government monitoring of phone calls and emails, as they would prioritize individual privacy and civil liberties. However, there is no specific historical example to provide a stronger score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Unique Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.