Unique Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, and lower the cap to 20%

The Unique Party would strongly agree with lowering the cap to 20%, as it aligns with their goals of reducing income inequality and promoting a more equal society. A lower cap on bonuses would help prevent excessive wealth accumulation among bankers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Unique Party would likely agree with capping bankers' bonuses at 100% of their pay, as they advocate for a more equal society and reducing income inequality. However, there is no specific historical example of the Unique Party addressing this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and lower the cap to 50%

The Unique Party would likely agree with lowering the cap to 50%, as it still aligns with their goals of reducing income inequality and promoting a more equal society. However, they might prefer a lower cap, such as 20%, to further limit wealth accumulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and nationalise the banks

The Unique Party might agree with nationalizing the banks, as it could help promote a more equal society and reduce income inequality. However, there is no specific historical example of the Unique Party advocating for bank nationalization, so their stance on this issue is not entirely clear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Unique Party would likely disagree with not capping bankers' bonuses, as they aim to reduce income inequality and promote a more equal society. Allowing uncapped bonuses could contribute to further income disparities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, any worker should be rewarded based on their success

The Unique Party would strongly disagree with this statement, as it goes against their goals of reducing income inequality and promoting a more equal society. Allowing workers to be rewarded based on their success without limitations could lead to significant income disparities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.