5 U.S. states have passed laws requiring welfare recipients to be tested for drugs. Proponents argue that testing will prevent public funds from being used to subsidize drugs habits and help get treatment for those that are addicted to drugs. Opponents argue that it is a waste of money since the tests will cost more money than they save.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
County
Response rates from 2k Left voters.
40% Yes |
60% No |
33% Yes |
51% No |
5% Yes, but provide treatment for those testing positive |
5% No, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse |
2% Yes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians |
3% No, this is a waste of time and money |
1% Yes, and immediately terminate benefits for anyone testing positive |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 2k Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 2k Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9D7JDWD1yr1Y
No, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse or if the recipients treatment could be dangerous if performed to a recipient on drugs.
@FilipR4yrs4Y
Yes, and provide treatment, but after two "strikes" cut benefits and/or send them to mandatory rehab.
@98GH5352yrs2Y
Provide treatment for those testing positive, expect those only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse
Join in on the most popular conversations.
