Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 750 Uppsala voters.
58% Yes |
42% No |
42% Yes |
42% No |
16% Yes, but not for cosmetics |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 750 Uppsala voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 750 Uppsala voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Uppsala voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9D7JDWD1yr1Y
Yes, but only after working out that the drug/medical device/vaccine/cosmetic will work in theory.
@9W3PHQ91mo1MO
If the animal is about to die or already dead and they make sure to euthanize them and give them a painless death then maybe
@9SMRXJR3mos3MO
Yes as long as its a vaccine that can benefit both animals and people such as in Japan where they give their chickens the vaccine against salmonella.
@95LHD562yrs2Y
Yes, aslong as the animal is treated well.
@94W89F42yrs2Y
Yes, but only for drugs/vaccines where it's anavoidable.
@94KDJVM2yrs2Y
Yes, but only when there are no alternative methods to animal testing of the requested products
@8ZZTH493yrs3Y
Yes, but not as many tests as it is at this point of date.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
