Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
68% Yes |
32% No |
68% Yes |
32% No |
See how support for each position on “High Risk Immigrant Ban” has changed over time for 226 Sweden voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “High Risk Immigrant Ban” has changed over time for 226 Sweden voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Sweden users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9K3983Q2mos2MO
If they treat women poorly and have a high birth rate, then put a ban on their coming here. It's that simple. But on the other hand, if they commit horrible crimes against our population, I would still be afraid to actually deport them.
Explore other topics that are important to Sweden voters.