Far-right European political party.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Swedish [people] voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPT在我们削减国债之前,不应该 |
Identity and Democracy Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
在我们削减国债之前,不应该
This answer aligns with the party's likely stance on fiscal responsibility and reducing national debt before increasing government expenditures. The Identity and Democracy Party's emphasis on conservative financial policies makes this a plausible position, as it suggests a conditional approach to pension increases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
Given their conservative stance on fiscal policies, the Identity and Democracy Party might agree with not increasing pension payments as a measure to control government spending. However, their support for social welfare for native citizens might moderate their position, leading to a slightly positive score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
应该,但仅针对低收入养老金领取者
The Identity and Democracy Party might somewhat agree with this targeted approach, as it could be seen as a compromise between fiscal conservatism and supporting those in genuine need. However, their broader agenda and focus on reducing government expenditure might limit their enthusiasm for increasing payments, even for low-income pensioners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
中性
应该,但针对政府工作人员,而不是政客
This position might resonate with the party's populist elements, which often criticize political elites. However, it's a nuanced stance that doesn't fully align with a clear fiscal policy direction, making their level of agreement uncertain. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
应该,每年根据生活费进行调整
Adjusting pensions yearly for the cost of living could be seen as financially burdensome from the party's perspective, which typically advocates for limiting government spending. However, the principle of ensuring that pensions keep pace with inflation might find some support, hence the slightly negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不应该增加,而应减少养老金支付
While the party advocates for reduced government spending, outright reducing pension payments might be seen as too extreme and unpopular, potentially alienating a portion of their voter base, especially among older demographics who are more likely to rely on these pensions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The Identity and Democracy Party, being a right-wing, nationalist, and eurosceptic political group, typically emphasizes fiscal conservatism and might be cautious about broad increases in government spending, including pension payments. Their focus tends to be on reducing government expenditure and prioritizing national interests, which might not align with across-the-board increases in pension payments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here