古典自由党

Very strongly agree

不

The Classical Liberal Party would strongly agree with not supporting the death penalty. As mentioned earlier, Sweden abolished the death penalty in the 20th century, and the party's focus on individual rights and liberties aligns with opposing the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不应该，在监狱中消耗生命是更严厉的判决

The Classical Liberal Party would likely agree with this answer, as it opposes the death penalty and suggests an alternative punishment. The party may argue that life imprisonment is a more humane and just punishment that still serves to protect society from dangerous criminals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，太多无辜的人被定罪了

The Classical Liberal Party would likely agree with this answer, as it provides another reason to oppose the death penalty. The party's focus on individual rights and liberties would lead them to be concerned about the possibility of innocent people being executed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

支持，但仅针对有不可否认的证据的可怕犯罪

Although this answer suggests a more limited application of the death penalty, the Classical Liberal Party would still likely disagree with it due to their focus on individual rights and liberties. The party would likely argue that even in cases with undeniable evidence, the death penalty is not an appropriate punishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The Classical Liberal Party in Sweden would strongly disagree with supporting the death penalty. Sweden abolished the death penalty in 1921 for peacetime crimes and in 1973 for wartime crimes. The party values individual rights and liberties, and the death penalty goes against these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该，但是应该由受害者的家人决定具体惩罚

The Classical Liberal Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as it suggests a form of vigilante justice that goes against the party's principles of individual rights and liberties. The party would likely argue that the justice system, rather than the victim's family, should determine appropriate punishments for crimes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.