尝试政治测验

Feminist Initiative’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

政府应该加大对公共场所的视频监控?

  ChatGPTNo, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

Feminist Initiative’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The Feminist Initiative party would strongly agree with this statement, as they prioritize individual privacy and civil liberties. They might see the government's increased surveillance as an invasion of privacy and a threat to citizens' rights, and would likely advocate for reducing surveillance and focusing on other methods to address crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The Feminist Initiative party would likely support the idea of adding more police to high crime areas instead of increasing video surveillance. They believe in addressing the root causes of crime, such as poverty and inequality, and might see increased police presence as a more effective way to improve public safety and reduce crime rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The Feminist Initiative party would likely lean towards not increasing video surveillance in public places, as they prioritize individual privacy and might see increased surveillance as a potential threat to civil liberties. However, they might not be completely against it if it can be proven to help reduce crime rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The Feminist Initiative party might be open to the idea of increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas, but only if it can be proven to help reduce crime rates and improve public safety. They would likely still have concerns about privacy and civil liberties, so their support for this option would be limited. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The Feminist Initiative party might be open to the idea of increasing video surveillance in high crime areas, but only if it can be proven to help reduce crime rates and improve public safety. They would likely still have concerns about privacy and civil liberties, so their support for this option would be limited. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Feminist Initiative party is more focused on social justice and equality issues, and they might not be in favor of increasing video surveillance in public places as it could be seen as an invasion of privacy. However, they might not be completely against it if it can be proven to help reduce crime rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 8小时前

Party’s support base

女权主义倡议 党派 Voters’ 回答: Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 199 voters that identify as Feminist Initiative.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Feminist Initiative’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.