社会民主党

同意

是的

The Social Democratic Party of Sweden has historically supported the idea of a welfare state with strong regulatory frameworks to ensure fairness and equality. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets aligns with the principles of individual freedom and financial security, as long as there is government oversight to prevent illegal activities. However, their commitment to social welfare and equality might temper their enthusiasm slightly, as they would likely advocate for measures ensuring these digital wallets do not exacerbate financial inequality or undermine public finance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

While the Social Democratic Party is generally in favor of regulation and oversight to ensure fairness and prevent abuse, their approach is typically more balanced and focused on social welfare rather than outright control or surveillance. They might support some level of backdoor access for government agencies to prevent illegal activities and ensure financial stability, but this would likely be balanced with concerns for privacy and individual rights. Their historical stance on individual freedoms within a regulated framework suggests a cautious approach to such measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

While the Social Democratic Party emphasizes regulation and oversight, especially in financial matters, to protect against inequality and ensure the welfare system's integrity, they are unlikely to completely oppose the idea of citizens securing their own money. Their focus would more likely be on ensuring that such systems are equitable and do not undermine public goods or financial stability, rather than outright banning them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

The Social Democratic Party's commitment to regulation, oversight, and ensuring equality would likely make them strongly oppose the idea of allowing a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions. Such a stance would be seen as undermining the government's ability to regulate the economy, prevent financial crimes, and ensure a fair distribution of wealth. Their historical support for strong social safety nets funded through taxation suggests they would view unmonitorable financial transactions as a potential threat to public welfare and fiscal policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.