社会党

Very strongly agree

Yes, but I would prefer if they were banned

This answer aligns closely with the Social Party's likely stance on economic policies aimed at reducing inequality and ensuring that corporations contribute fairly to society. The preference for banning stock buybacks altogether, rather than merely taxing them, reflects a strong interventionist approach to regulating corporate behavior, consistent with the party's values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The Social Party, being a left-leaning entity, typically supports measures that increase government revenue for social programs and reduce wealth inequality. Taxing stock buybacks could be seen as a way to discourage a practice that disproportionately benefits wealthy shareholders and executives, aligning with the party's broader goals of economic fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, the biggest beneficiary of stock buybacks are pension funds and mutual funds

Although recognizing that pension funds and mutual funds benefit from stock buybacks could be a valid point, the Social Party might argue that the overall impact of buybacks on economic inequality and corporate governance still warrants regulatory action, including taxation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, there is no evidence that firms that engage in buybacks reduce their investments

While the argument that buybacks do not reduce firm investments might appeal to some economic perspectives, the Social Party would likely remain skeptical. Their focus on equitable economic policies might lead them to question the broader implications of buybacks on income distribution and corporate responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Given the Social Party's inclination towards progressive taxation and reducing income inequality, it is unlikely they would support leaving stock buybacks untaxed. They would probably view such a stance as favoring corporate interests over public welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.