Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 338 Independents voters.
38% Yes |
62% No |
21% Yes |
58% No |
7% Yes, but there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money |
3% No, funding should come from their members |
5% Yes, but only if all political parties receive the same amount |
|
2% Yes, but the amount they currently receive should be reduced |
|
2% Yes, and funding should be proportional to the amount of votes they receive |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 338 Independents voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 338 Independents voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Independents voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9KGXMFM9mos9MO
I choose both "Yes, and funding should be proportional to the amount of votes they receive" and "Yes, but there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money".
@9FH247L1yr1Y
Yes, but only if all parties are funded equally and private donations are banned
@9D7JDWD1yr1Y
Yes, but only if all political parties recieve the same amount, they cant use it on other things than campaigning, and political parties cant use money from other sources for campaigning.
@952R2DS2yrs2Y
Publicly funded elections have shown to work well when the private, corporate and 'black money' donors are prevented from flooding the elections with money.
@98GH5352yrs2Y
There should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money, alternatively funding should come from their members, usually depends
@97QSF4L2yrs2Y
Yes, but arrange it so that all parties receive the same amount and reduce it.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
