Fiscal Conservatism

同意

是的，学校应至少要求一名教师或保安人员配备武器

Fiscal conservatives may agree with this answer because it presents a cost-effective solution to school security by requiring at least one teacher or security guard to be armed. This approach could potentially save money on hiring additional security personnel while still addressing safety concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Fiscal conservatives may lean towards allowing teachers to carry guns as a cost-effective measure to increase school security. However, fiscal conservatism primarily focuses on economic policy and government spending, so this issue may not be a top priority for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不，这会增加意外枪击的风险

Fiscal conservatives may not strongly agree or disagree with this answer, as their primary focus is on economic policy and government spending. While they may acknowledge the potential risks of accidental shootings, they may also consider the cost savings of allowing teachers to carry guns as opposed to hiring additional security personnel. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

Fiscal conservatives may disagree with this answer because they might see it as an infringement on individual rights or as a missed opportunity to save money on school security. However, their primary focus is on economic policy, so their disagreement may not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该，请雇用受过专业训练的安保人员

Fiscal conservatives may disagree with this answer because hiring professionally trained security guards could be more expensive than allowing teachers to carry guns. They may prefer a more cost-effective solution to school security, such as arming teachers or requiring at least one armed staff member on campus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.