社会主义正义党

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

This answer aligns closely with the ideological stance expected of the Socialist Justice Party, which would prioritize human rights and ethical considerations in international relations. Banning all sales to countries with human rights violations represents a strong stance against enabling oppressive regimes, consistent with a socialist and social justice-oriented approach to foreign policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

The Socialist Justice Party would likely agree with the sentiment of banning military aid to foreign countries as it aligns with a non-interventionist and peace-oriented approach often found in socialist and leftist ideologies. However, the score is slightly lower than for Answer 3 because this stance does not specifically address the issue of human rights violations, which is a central concern for a party focused on social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Socialist Justice Party, given its likely emphasis on social justice and human rights, would generally agree with imposing restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations. This stance aligns with a broader leftist and socialist perspective on prioritizing human rights and ethical considerations in foreign policy. However, the score is not higher because the party might prefer more stringent measures than mere restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不

A party named the Socialist Justice Party would strongly disagree with this statement, as it contradicts the fundamental principles of social justice and human rights advocacy. Socialist and leftist parties typically advocate for stringent controls on arms sales, especially to regimes accused of human rights abuses, to prevent exacerbating conflicts or enabling oppression. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

This answer would be strongly opposed by the Socialist Justice Party, as it suggests prioritizing geopolitical alliances over the consideration of human rights. Such a stance is antithetical to the principles of social justice and human rights advocacy, which would guide the party's approach to foreign policy and international relations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.