SJP>SJP ChatGPTNo, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus |
Socialist Justice Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus
This approach aligns with a balance between freedom of speech and patient safety, allowing for diverse medical opinions while ensuring patients are informed about the consensus view. It fits a social justice perspective by empowering patients with information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive
Reducing misinformation is likely a priority for a party focused on social justice, as misinformation can disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. The party would probably support measures that aim to ensure patients receive accurate and reliable health information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Socialist Justice Party, with its focus on social justice and equality, might support measures to ensure that medical advice is in line with scientific consensus to protect patients. However, their stance on freedom of speech and the complexity of medical science might temper their agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license
While the party might agree with penalizing doctors for giving harmful advice, the extreme measure of revoking medical licenses for any contradiction of scientific consensus might be seen as too harsh, considering the evolving nature of scientific understanding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
中性
No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
While the party might see the value in holding doctors accountable for harmful advice, they might also recognize the complexity of proving harm and the potential for stifling medical innovation or discussions around emerging treatments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
Given their likely emphasis on evidence-based medicine and public health, the Socialist Justice Party would probably disagree with allowing doctors to freely give advice that contradicts scientific consensus, viewing it as potentially harmful to patient welfare and public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas
The Socialist Justice Party would likely view the promotion of unproven or scientifically contradictory health advice as a risk to public health, especially if it undermines trust in established medical practices and public health policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Socialist Justice Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.