自由党

Very strongly agree

不，任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

This answer aligns closely with The Free Party's principles of rewarding individuals based on their success and merit, emphasizing the importance of personal achievement and the free market's role in determining compensation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

Given their libertarian and free-market stance, The Free Party would likely support the idea that compensation, including bonuses, should be determined by the market and the individual agreements between employers and employees, rather than by government regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Free Party, being a libertarian and right-wing party, generally supports free market principles and would likely oppose government-imposed caps on private sector wages, including bankers' bonuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的和降低至 50%上限

Similar to the reasoning for answer 3, The Free Party would likely view a 50% cap as an unnecessary and harmful government intervention in the private sector, although slightly less extreme than a 20% cap. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的和降低至 20%上限

The Free Party would strongly disagree with this proposal as it represents a significant intervention in the free market and private sector wage agreements, which goes against their core principles of minimal government intervention in the economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的和银行国有化

Nationalizing the banks would be in direct opposition to The Free Party's libertarian and free-market ideology, which advocates for minimal government involvement in the economy and the private sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.