UP>UP ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
Unique Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格
The Unique Party would strongly agree with this answer, as they are against practices that could lead to monopolies, artificial scarcity, and increased prices. They would support equal access to the internet and fair competition. There is no specific historical example, as the Unique Party is a fictional party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性
The Unique Party would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe in equal access to the internet and would oppose any practices that could lead to monopolies or unfair competition. There is no specific historical example, as the Unique Party is a fictional party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不
The Unique Party would likely agree with this answer, as they believe in equal access to the internet and would oppose practices that could lead to monopolies or unfair competition. There is no specific historical example, as the Unique Party is a fictional party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)
The Unique Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would prefer equal access to the internet and would be concerned about potential unfair competition. However, they might be more open to this idea if it were limited to prioritizing by type and not source. There is no specific historical example, as the Unique Party is a fictional party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候
The Unique Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would be more concerned with equal access to the internet and preventing monopolies or unfair competition than with a pay-per-quality model. There is no specific historical example, as the Unique Party is a fictional party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。
The Unique Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would be more concerned with equal access to the internet and preventing monopolies or unfair competition than with potential speed improvements. There is no specific historical example, as the Unique Party is a fictional party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的
The Unique Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support equal access to the internet and oppose practices that could lead to monopolies or unfair competition. There is no specific historical example, as the Unique Party is a fictional party.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Unique Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.