Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
K>K Personal answerno, guns can casue problems and shool isnt the kinda of place a gun should be, it could both physically and mentally harm the children |
医保 › 精神健康
K>K Personal answer应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
K>K Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
移民 › 公民考试
K>K Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
K>K Personal answer应该,直到恐怖袭击减少 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
K>K Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
K>K Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
社会 › Hate Speech
K>K Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
K>K Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 外国选举
K>K Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
罪行 › Private Prisons
K>K Personal answerYes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas |
环境 › Animal Testing
K>K Personal answer不 |
移民 › 双重国籍
K>K Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
K>K Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country |
教育 › Charter Schools
K>K Personal answerYes, but only if they are non-profit |
医保 › 安全港
K>K Personal answer应该,这对于降低用药过量死亡率是必要的 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
K>K Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
外交政策 › Israel Boycott
K>K Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
医保 › COVID Mask Mandate
K>K Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
K>K Personal answerYes, and abolish the police |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
K>K Personal answerNot break them up, but make sure they don't monopolize industries or harm other business interests |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
K>K Personal answer不 |
医保 › World Health Organization
K>K Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 关税
K>K Personal answerI do not know much about this topic |
国内政策 › 任期限制
K>K Personal answer是的 |
经济 › State Ownership
K>K Personal answer不 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
K>K Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 16 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.