Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › LGBT收养权
B>B Personal answerIt should be the individual choice of each individual and agency involved. |
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
B>B Personal answerThis should be left to the discretion of each individual school or organization. |
社会 › Gender Transition
B>B Personal answer是的 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
B>B Personal answerNo, but extra scrutiny should be given Muslin immigrants. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
B>B Personal answerIt should be the choice of each individual organization. |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
B>B Personal answer不 |
移民 › High Risk Immigrant Ban
B>B Personal answer不 |
社会 › Hate Speech
B>B Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
B>B Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
外交政策 › 外国选举
B>B Personal answerYes, to support the protection of individual rights. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
B>B Personal answerIt should be left to the discretion of each individual prison system. |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
B>B Personal answerIt should be left to the individual choice of each business. |
环境 › Animal Testing
B>B Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
B>B Personal answerNo, the Government should repeal all laws regarding hours of work. It should be left up to individual employers and employees to negotiate these terms without government interference. |
外交政策 › 以色列
B>B Personal answerYes, we should support Israel morally and militarily as we share the same enemies but we should not be supporting Israel monetarily. |
外交政策 › 军费支出
B>B Personal answerRegardless, the government's military focus should be on protecting it's citizens from foreign aggression. |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
B>B Personal answerYes, but because prison should be a last resort for the truly dangerous. |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
B>B Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
B>B Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 双重国籍
B>B Personal answer是的 |
教育 › Charter Schools
B>B Personal answerNo, and our entire education system should be privatized. |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
B>B Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
B>B Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 社会福利
B>B Personal answerMore, and the goal should be to eliminate all government welfare. |
经济 › 工会
B>B Personal answerHelp, but labor laws themselves hurt the economy. |
罪行 › Criminal Justice Use of AI
B>B Personal answer不 |
Technology › Data Privacy
B>B Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
B>B Personal answer不 |
经济 › 国内工作
B>B Personal answerYes, but not to keep jobs in the U.S. but because taxation is immoral and should be cut/eliminated anywhere and everywhere possible. Across the board tax cuts would be preferable. |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
B>B Personal answer是的 |
交通运输 › Electric Vehicle Mandates
B>B Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
B>B Personal answer不 |
经济 › 政府养老金
B>B Personal answerRetired government workers should get exactly whatever they were promised. |
Housing › Affordable Housing
B>B Personal answer不 |
社会 › Teacher and Faculty Diversity Training
B>B Personal answerNo, only private schools should be allowed to require mandatory training |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
B>B Personal answer不 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
B>B Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Facial Recognition
B>B Personal answer不 |
社会 › Student Diversity Training
B>B Personal answerNo, only private schools should be allowed to require mandatory training |
经济 › Inflation
B>B Personal answer不 |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
B>B Personal answer不 |
Housing › Foreign Real Estate Investment
B>B Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Gaza ceasefire
B>B Personal answer不 |
Housing › Rent Control
B>B Personal answer不 |
社会 › Frozen Embryos Legal Status
B>B Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
B>B Personal answerThis should be left to the discretion of each individual company. |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
B>B Personal answer不 |
社会 › Employee Diversity Training
B>B Personal answerYes, as long as it doesn't violate any employer/employee contracts, companies should be allowed to have foolish policies like diversity training. |
Housing › Green Spaces
B>B Personal answer不 |
医保 › World Health Organization
B>B Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Cross-border Payments
B>B Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › Diesel Emission Standards
B>B Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Weapon Sales Ethics
B>B Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Restorative Justice Programs
B>B Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Backdoor Access to Encrypted Communications
B>B Personal answer不 |
医保 › Medical Consensus
B>B Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › Fuel Efficiency Requirements
B>B Personal answer不 |
Technology › Ethical Artificial Intelligence
B>B Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Two State Solution for Israel and Palestine
B>B Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Defense
B>B Personal answer是的 |
交通运输 › Distracted Driving Penalties
B>B Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › Advanced Automotive Technology
B>B Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Israeli Palestinian Conflict
B>B Personal answer以色列 |
外交政策 › AI Warfare Ethics
B>B Personal answer是的 |
医保 › Marketing Unhealthy Products to Youth
B>B Personal answer不 |
经济 › Surcharge Ban
B>B Personal answer不 |
Housing › Homeless Shelters
B>B Personal answer不 |
Housing › First-time Homebuyer Subsidies
B>B Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › 高速铁路
B>B Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
B>B Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Netanyahu Leadership
B>B Personal answer是的 |
环境 › EV Subsidies
B>B Personal answer不 |
环境 › Food Waste
B>B Personal answer不 |
Housing › High density residential buildings
B>B Personal answerNo, but government should eliminate regulations and zoning laws that prevent it. |
交通运输 › Congestion Pricing
B>B Personal answerNo, cities should privatize their roads and allow common law to determine rights of way. |
经济 › CEO Pay Cap
B>B Personal answer不 |
经济 › Stock Buybacks
B>B Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › Ride-Sharing Subsidies
B>B Personal answer不 |
环境 › Geoengineering
B>B Personal answer不 |
Housing › Foreclosure Assistance
B>B Personal answer不 |
科学 › Lab Grown Meat
B>B Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Saudi Arabia and Iran
B>B Personal answerNo, because both are Muslim dictatorships that pose a threat to us. |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
B>B Personal answerIt should be decided by the free market without interference from government. |
环境 › Carbon Capture Subsidies
B>B Personal answer不 |
Technology › Cryptocurrencies
B>B Personal answer不 |
经济 › State Ownership
B>B Personal answerNo, and it should never bail out private companies. |
Technology › 社交媒体监管
B>B Personal answer不 |
科学 › CRISPR Technology
B>B Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › Autonomous Vehicle Regulation
B>B Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › Bicycles and Bike Lanes
B>B Personal answer不 |
Technology › Self Hosted Digital Wallets
B>B Personal answerYes, citizens should be allowed to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets but the government should not be able to monitor or control it without a warrant. |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
B>B Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
B>B Personal answerYes, but only in tax reductions. I would prefer taxes be lowered for everyone rather than for individual companies. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 16 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 22 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.