Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
移民 › 遣送移民罪犯出境
J>J Personal answer是的,但是在他们完成服刑之后 |
移民 › 移民同化
J>J Personal answerNo, but the government should provide free language learning courses and incentives to encourage it |
社会 › 堕胎
J>J Personal answer主张堕胎合法,提供节育、性教育以及更多社会服务能帮助减少堕胎数量 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
J>J Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
J>J Personal answer不应该,请雇用受过专业训练的安保人员 |
社会 › 女性在战斗中
J>J Personal answer应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试 |
医保 › 精神健康
J>J Personal answer应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
科学 › 核能
J>J Personal answer不,我们应该投资在更清洁的替代能源上,比如风能、水力发电、钍和地热 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
J>J Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
社会 › Gender Transition
J>J Personal answerYes, but with parental permission |
移民 › 公民考试
J>J Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
J>J Personal answer不 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
J>J Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
社会 › 安乐死
J>J Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
J>J Personal answer是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
J>J Personal answer不 |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
J>J Personal answer是的,但只是对大型国际企业而言 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
J>J Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
J>J Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
J>J Personal answer是的,但是豁免那些其宗教信仰禁止注射疫苗的孩子。 |
环境 › Animal Testing
J>J Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
J>J Personal answer不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务 |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
J>J Personal answer是的,我们应该尊重所有文化传统 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
J>J Personal answer是的,但他们必须每天进行社区服务 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
J>J Personal answer不 |
移民 › 双重国籍
J>J Personal answer是,除非他们实施了犯罪 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
J>J Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
医保 › 安全港
J>J Personal answer不应该,但应该合法化毒品 |
教育 › Charter Schools
J>J Personal answerYes, but not at the expense of funding public schools |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
J>J Personal answer是的,但是只在服完他们的刑期和缓刑之后 |
移民 › 技术移民
J>J Personal answer我十分满意现在的数量 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
J>J Personal answer减少对外援助支出,直到显著减少我国的预算赤字 |
经济 › 社会福利
J>J Personal answer增加限制,改革制度,使福利补充而不是替代工作收入 |
经济 › 工会
J>J Personal answer理论上是有帮助的,但最近腐败现象太多,应该限制其权力 |
经济 › 经济刺激
J>J Personal answer是的,但是使用对低收入公民减税的形式 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
J>J Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
J>J Personal answer是的 |
交通运输 › 公共交通
J>J Personal answer不,我们有更重要的问题需要资金支持 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
J>J Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
J>J Personal answer是,只要报告离岸收入 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
J>J Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
J>J Personal answer是的 |
医保 › World Health Organization
J>J Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
经济 › 政府支出
J>J Personal answer是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
J>J Personal answer不,我们已经有任期限制了就是“选举” |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
J>J Personal answerYes, but I would prefer lowering corporate taxes to benefit all local companies |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.