Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
外交政策 › United States of Europe
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 精神健康
8>8 Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
移民 › 公民考试
8>8 Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
社会 › 安乐死
8>8 Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
社会 › Gender Transition
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if they are at least 16 years old |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
国内政策 › 视频监控
8>8 Personal answerNo, more police should be added to high crime areas instead |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
8>8 Personal answerNej, regeringen ska inte få reglera. Men de privata företagen som styr sociala medier bör vara skyldiga att förhindra desinformation. |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
8>8 Personal answer不 |
社会 › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answerNo, and increase penalties for hate speech |
外交政策 › 外国选举
8>8 Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
8>8 Personal answer不,但如果致命疾病传染到了其他孩子身上,要让父母负刑事责任。 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
8>8 Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
环境 › 环境规制
8>8 Personal answerJa, men de måste även se till att den lagstiftning som redan finns faktiskt efterlevs. Annars finns det ingen mening med att öka miljölagstiftningen. |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
8>8 Personal answerNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial |
教育 › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerNo, we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 双重国籍
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › EU Army
8>8 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
8>8 Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
移民 › 技术移民
8>8 Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
8>8 Personal answerJa, efter avtjänat straff och med undantag för de som dömts för grova brott. |
经济 › VAT Rates
8>8 Personal answerDecrease, but only on food and medicine |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
8>8 Personal answerFörbjud tillverkning av dessa produkter, se så att det som finns på marknaden nu används upp. Sedan kan de förbjudas. |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
8>8 Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
移民 › Migrant Children
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
8>8 Personal answerNej, men ländernas underrättelsemyndigheter bör samarbeta. |
外交政策 › Backstop
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answerNej, men får ett parti göra reklam så ska även andra partier få göra det. Medieföretagen ska vara mindre partiska. |
环境 › 转基因食品
8>8 Personal answerJa, men patentering av frön får inte förekomma och genmodifierade produkter ska alltid vara märkta. |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
8>8 Personal answerJa, så länge det inte är på samma plats under en längre tid. |
医保 › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 关税
8>8 Personal answerSänk för privatpersoner, höj för företag. |
外交政策 › European Commission
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerNo, funding should come from their members |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
8>8 Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
经济 › State Ownership
8>8 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 16 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.