Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › LGBT收养权
9>9 Personal answerNo, and adoption agencies should prioritize offering children to straight couples before offering to gay couples |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 精神健康
9>9 Personal answer应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answer应该,而且不仅只是测试基本水平的理解能力 |
社会 › Gender Transition
9>9 Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answer不 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
9>9 Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
国内政策 › 视频监控
9>9 Personal answerYes, and more police should be added to high crime areas |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
9>9 Personal answer不 |
社会 › Hate Speech
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answer不 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
9>9 Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
9>9 Personal answerVarken mer eller mindre, men förse sjukvården med mer statliga medel |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 双重国籍
9>9 Personal answer是,除非他们实施了犯罪 |
教育 › Charter Schools
9>9 Personal answerYes, but not at the expense of funding public schools |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answer减少,而且政府应该更多地鼓励我国公民为担任这些工作做好准备。 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
9>9 Personal answerMinska, men öka handel med dessa länder |
经济 › VAT Rates
9>9 Personal answerIncrease, but only on luxury purchases |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
9>9 Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
经济 › 政府养老金
9>9 Personal answerÖka pensionsutbetalningar för alla pensionärer |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Backstop
9>9 Personal answer不 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
9>9 Personal answer不 |
医保 › World Health Organization
9>9 Personal answerNo, fund national and local programs instead |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › European Commission
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
9>9 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 跨大西洋贸易和投资伙伴
9>9 Personal answerNo, this will incentivize companies to move jobs out of the country |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
9>9 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
9>9 Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
经济 › State Ownership
9>9 Personal answerNo, this impedes technological progress due to competition being stifled |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.