Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 堕胎
9>9 Personal answerPro-choice, long as it is a actual reason why to. If someone wants to have one just because they messed up they shouldn't be able because they made the choice. If someone accidentally got rape or any violence to cause them to get an abortion, they should be allow to and support a voluntary eugenics program for profit. |
社会 › LGBT收养权
9>9 Personal answerAs long as the couple is in a stable relationship, they follow the man-woman dichotomy and pass the same background checks as straight couples, they can adopt. |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
9>9 Personal answerIf it actually worked and everyone was unified. But the likelyhood is low. |
外交政策 › 欧洲联盟
9>9 Personal answerNo but I support an EFTA/EEC style deal with close links economically to Europe if Remain is off the table similar to what Iceland and Norway have. |
经济 › 税
9>9 Personal answerThe taxes should be base in percentage of how much our income is. |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answerKind off, make this a part of education instead |
社会 › 安乐死
9>9 Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answerRegardless, require strict background and interview tests for immigrants who are wanting to enter Sweden. No rapists and child molesters. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only in circumstances where there is no risk of biological advantage |
国内政策 › 视频监控
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only in places where crime rates are high |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
9>9 Personal answerKind of. There should be fines on major media companies for getting a story incorrect or exaggerating, or cherry picking a story to fit their agenda. |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answerDepends but the definition of the term "authoritarian government" is too broad |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
9>9 Personal answerNo drugs should be treated as a health issue not a criminal issue |
社会 › Hate Speech
9>9 Personal answerNo, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
9>9 Personal answerEven though that is too broad, the most qualified person should earn that position without workplace abuse/discrimination |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answerYes once they get their citizenship |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
环境 › 环境规制
9>9 Personal answerRemake the industry completly. Todays industries are all about producing as much as possible, the faster a product is broken the more will be produced. Cars, Freezers, dishwashers. When things don't last and constantly needs to be made anew or replace Increase enviro-regulations on businesses that aims for producing as much products as possible rather than producing things that actually lasts. Today's industry is all about producing weak and squishy things that won't last for more than a couple of years/months/weeks. Older cars are better than new cars because they can be repaired and driven further and not collapse within 15 years of use. Same could be said about everything that comes out of our industries, refrigirators, |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
9>9 Personal answerI do not agree with the practice, but you do not fight coercion with coercion ! |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
9>9 Personal answerNo but some form of voluntary national service should be required without private contractors to bring back the civilian soldier and bring back the draft. |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
9>9 Personal answerOvercrowding is not the reason |
国内政策 › 举报人保护
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as the information was obtained through the proper channels. |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerYes if there is undeniable evidence that they play a vital role in leading; coordinating or participating in creating an intended terrorist attack in Europe or have done so in a previous attack. |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answerIncrease, but the government has to make sure that companies don't take advantage of the program to decrease wages. |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answerNo, but limited, and more savings for recycling them. |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
9>9 Personal answerI am undecided on this, however very open to the benefits of both sides |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
9>9 Personal answerNo, but cooperating better over borders could be a good idea. |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
9>9 Personal answerNo, this should be decided after the current war ends so we avoid a third world war |
外交政策 › Backstop
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
9>9 Personal answerNo, but they shouldn't be able to decide what advertisements to accept based on what party is trying to sell advertisements. |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
9>9 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 政府支出
9>9 Personal answerReform the public service so it’s run efficiently and is more cost effective. Merge government departments. |
外交政策 › European Commission
9>9 Personal answerNo, but the whole EU should be reformed. |
国内政策 › 任期限制
9>9 Personal answerNo, politicians are not meant to serve for life, however people should have the right to re-elect someone if they feel that the representative is doing a good job in office. There are other ways to limit the corruption of politics. |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only if there is transparency and all parties receive an equal amount. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.